top of page

Берегись этого чай. There, fixed it.

Bit surprised that I'm not as affected by this news as I should be. Maybe it's because I've heard related news mentioned on the radio before reading it online. (Speaking of broadcasts, tenuous link between these, perhaps, but I don't mind making the association if it points out a slippery slope.) At this point, considering the other news in tech, this breach is about as startling as the news from space earlier in the year. (Plague - scream! Contagion - hoarse scream! Murder hornets - pant, wheeze... UFOs - sod this, I'm out of scream.)

I'm only slightly more curious as to why one person was chosen for a government post over another - whether it was entirely because one candidate was less suitable (no plums for cannibals, it seems) or because the candidate was willing to call half of those potential constituents a name by proxy (then again, forget the proxy). Having more context shows just how out of proportion this situation actually is, and I think I can understand why no apology should be expected, but let me see if I've got this right about double negatives - if you're not saying they're not something, you are saying they are.

Seen this sort of thing before - my, isn't that contagious, Dorian. A shiny new point for the list of reasons to vote elsewhere? Don't mind if I do.

Keeping handy here (ouch) a pile of news to 看. (Still there, 微软, but since you lot are busy...)

Also posting these two to compare an anecdote with a larger-scale view.

I'll end with an admonition to have some cookies with that чай, and another reason to be solidly Trek over Wars.

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Classic
  • Twitter Classic
  • Google Classic
bottom of page