Addendum 3/24
As entertaining as it's been figuring out a way around this hurdle, I'm looking forward to repairing this formatting setup.
If I interpret this correctly, whether Madam Term Limits receives Communion or not is not her call to make. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/pelosi-slams-archbishop-cordileone-wont-let-her-take-communion?_amp=true (I'd say 'his body, his choice,' but as amusing as I find the use of the phrase in this situation, the comparison is slightly off.)
From what I understand about Confirmation, it's an agreement one makes in order to be part of that specific religious community - XYZ are the tenets of belief and expectations of conduct, and one makes a fully informed commitment (having years of experience to inform that commitment) to live with those beliefs and that conduct. And if I recall, Birthing Parent Day was an associated thing.
https://www.newsweek.com/biden-admin-replaces-mothers-birthing-people-maternal-health-guidance-1598343 (Yep, I do recall.)
But why not speak to the fratello above him? I'm sure he'd be up for another photo op, and complicit as he's already been with a 兄弟, he might be more accepting of "pretty much" the one thing that leads to drastic consequences for so many.
Adding this to ask where one can find a clip of just the hearing itself (likely C-Span), since it seems like those who watch a counterweight network are associated with a particular sort of face than those who watch, say, a Cable Opinion Wreck. (Nielsen.) Adding a caveat in case this video or related ones stray into human trafficker はげ territory.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XdzAKyt_idM&t=109
Yep, C-Span. When uninformed opinion leads to political action at this level, there is every need to speak up, and every danger with stifling oneself for the sake of niceness.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?526578-1/house-panel-examines-twitter-moderation-practices#
Ending with this because not my religion either, but -nomy is fascinating.
