How is this new?
And why do I have the odd feeling that this title fits the title?
- There was a puff piece earlier about a novelty plastic drinks bag somewhere in Southeast Asia (not the Philippines - and it's -na, thanks). I wondered then if the language thereabouts had a name to match its nature. Revisited that thought upon learning such a nature has now been applied to both sides of the abortion argument. Progress means men can wear makeup again - fella could do with some eye shadow, on a brush and a fork.
- From an electorate that expands definitions and changes fictional sports nomenclature to suit what they think comes an administration that finds similar rewrites acceptable. Given this information, gosh, I wouldn't know about the reason for so much complaining about that choice now. The other puff pieces currently in the feed state a preference for something new, so I'm wondering about that which implies an active preference for my favorite dead comedian's position on voting. However, I do know that I enjoy dissenting with that position while maintaining my own stance "on the other hand."
- The hot air heads I hear on the radio give me reason to dig my heels in on hairstick. Reading this gives me reason to wonder if there's something to the counterargument - I'd understand that the opposition would be found objectionable, but it was part of the CCCP; and if these labs exist, I wonder at the objection to avoidance. Wonder at it, but disagree (to clarify, with the avoidance) - after this (fuel now, as well as food?), I'm heels in on the stance that there comes a point where one hits back.
Ending with this to revisit food, fun, and fencing.