Post for today
These articles are why I mentioned earlier that eliminating any media outlet would be a problem. You got a medic resorting to drastic measures on the one hand, and policies that would force more people to similar measures on the other. Thing is, on that other hand is a flouting of the laws one would apply to others and, if the numbers are accurate, the cause of the increase in infections those laws failed to prevent. Backlash toward one outlet won't change that the directives being made will result in more videos. I think I'll be grateful for varied sources instead (interesting what a slip can reveal, sickles), thanks ever so. (Has it even been weeks since the last apology for another maskless party? The ones that seem remarkably like those that just showed up on the news cycle? Two syllables, starts with D, also rhymes with class.)
While I'm on the topic of measures taken in order to eat, there exists a regime trying to feed a large population, but if I remember correctly, they're still feeling the effects of livestock illnesses as well as currently restricting sources of imported food, so I can make a rough guess of why they're still endangering fish stocks nearer to other countries. Coupled with the rest of the news available, I'm still going with ä½ æ˜¯A in this scenario. (That's three now, key-dropper; and still there, 微软.)
Ah, crap. More earth plus plastic equals more relevant dead comedian.
Huh. Arc Net?
Best to end with this laudable news - not that she needs my glee, but she's got it.